HANALEI.DEV PORTFOLIO / AI Governance Committee Charter

AI Governance Committee Charter

Governing structure, membership responsibilities, operating cadence, approval workflows, and escalation rules for a cross-functional AI Governance Committee.

Document TypeCommittee Charter
Meeting CadenceMonthly + Ad Hoc
Framework AlignmentNIST AI RMF GOVERN
Version1.0

Mission mamp; Authority

The AI Governance Committee (AGC) is a standing cross-functional body responsible for overseeing the responsible adoption, use, and risk management of artificial intelligence systems across the organization. The committee holds approval authority for AI tool adoption, policy development, and escalation decisions involving AI-related risk.

Governing Principle

The AGC exists to enable AI adoption, not obstruct it. Its role is to ensure that speed is matched with accountability, and that business value from AI is delivered without creating unmanageable risk or harm to people inside or outside the organization.

Committee Composition

The AGC is composed of five permanent members representing Legal, Security, HR, Product, and IT. The AI Governance Lead serves as chair. Additional subject matter experts may be invited to specific meetings as non-voting participants.

Legal
General Counsel or Delegate
Legal Representative
Regulatory compliance and liability review Contract and DPA oversight IP and data rights guidance Escalation triage for legal exposure
Security
CISO or Delegate
Security Representative
Vendor security review sign-off Access control and integration standards Incident classification and response Security controls for approved tools
HR
CHRO or Delegate
HR Representative
Employee data protection oversight Workforce impact assessment Training and change management AI in HR processes review
Product
VP Product or Delegate
Product Representative
AI in product roadmap coordination Customer-facing AI feature review Use case prioritization input User impact and ethics liaison
IT
CTO or IT Director
IT Representative
Infrastructure and integration review API and access provisioning Tool registry maintenance Technical feasibility assessment
Chair
AI Governance Lead
Committee Chair
Agenda setting and facilitation Policy drafting and maintenance Intake and registry management Reporting to executive leadership

Meeting Schedule

Meeting TypeFrequencyDurationRequired AttendeesStanding Agenda
Monthly Full Committee First Tuesday of each month 60 minutes All five representatives + Chair Tool intake reviews, policy updates, incident review, metrics review, open items
Quarterly Executive Brief End of each quarter 30 minutes Chair + C-suite sponsor AI risk posture summary, approved/denied tools, incidents, upcoming policy changes
Ad Hoc: Incident Review Within 48 hours of Medium+ incident 45 minutes Chair, CISO, Legal + affected function Incident timeline, impact assessment, remediation decisions, communication plan
Ad Hoc: Expedited Tool Review As needed, with 5-day notice 30 minutes Chair + relevant reviewers Business case, risk summary, security findings, decision
Annual Policy Review Each January 90 minutes All members Full policy library review, framework updates, lessons learned, roadmap for year

Quorum for a decision at monthly meetings requires at least four of five representatives. Decisions are made by simple majority. The Chair holds a tiebreaking vote. All decisions are recorded in the meeting log maintained by the Chair.

How Decisions Get Made

The following workflow applies to all AI tool approvals, policy changes, and risk exception requests submitted to the AGC.

1
Submission
Business unit or employee submits a request via the AI intake form. Chair acknowledges receipt within 2 business days and assigns a tracking number.
Owner: SubmitterSLA: 2 days
2
Triage and Classification
Chair reviews submission and assigns risk tier. Low-risk requests proceed to abbreviated two-reviewer track. Medium and above go to full committee.
Owner: ChairSLA: 3 business days
3
Assigned Review
Security and Legal complete their domain reviews in parallel. Findings are submitted to the Chair at least 3 business days before the relevant committee meeting.
Owner: CISO + LegalSLA: 7 business days
4
Committee Decision
Full committee reviews findings at monthly meeting. Votes to Approve, Approve with Conditions, Request More Information, or Deny. All outcomes are documented.
Owner: Full CommitteeNext monthly meeting
5
Communication and Registry
Chair communicates decision to submitter within 2 business days. Approved tools are added to the registry. Denied requests receive a written rationale and may be resubmitted after 90 days.
Owner: ChairSLA: 2 business days post-decision

Escalation Framework

Not all decisions can wait for the monthly meeting. The following escalation tiers define when and how issues are elevated above the standard workflow.

Tier 1
Standard

All routine tool requests and policy questions. Handled through standard monthly workflow. No escalation required. Chair resolves or tables to next meeting.

Tier 2
Expedited

Time-sensitive business requests or Medium-severity incidents requiring decision within 10 business days. Chair convenes an ad hoc session with relevant members. VP-level business sponsor required to initiate expedited track.

Tier 3
Urgent

High-severity incidents, active data exposure, or regulatory inquiry. Chair, CISO, and General Counsel convene within 24 hours. Chair notifies C-suite sponsor same day. Committee may suspend tool access pending review without full quorum.

Tier 4
Critical

Critical incidents with regulatory, legal, or reputational consequences. CISO and General Counsel brief CEO within 4 hours. Board notification within 24 hours. External counsel and, if applicable, regulatory disclosure obligations assessed immediately. AGC transitions to incident command posture until resolved.